Difference between revisions of "10 Thesen"
From OOEM
Jump to navigationJump to search
AndreasLeue (talk | contribs) |
AndreasLeue (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{T| | |||
# Mythos: "Business vs. IT"-Kampf (sie haben keine Chance) | # Mythos: "Business vs. IT"-Kampf (sie haben keine Chance) | ||
# Mythos: Fachprozesse = BPM(N)/EPK = Wandschmuck | # Mythos: Fachprozesse = BPM(N)/EPK = Wandschmuck | ||
Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
Mit diesen Thesen befaßte sich der [[Vorträge|Vortrag]] am 8.12.2009. | Mit diesen Thesen befaßte sich der [[Vorträge|Vortrag]] am 8.12.2009. | ||
| | |||
# Myth: "Business vs. IT"-Infighting (they have no chance) | |||
# Myth: Business Process = BPM(N)/EPC = Schrankware | |||
# Myth: IT = UML = technical = overly intricate | |||
# There's only one reality (and a Single Source Model is better, anyway) | |||
# Too simple: Process = Funktion Hierarchy | |||
# Flow and Strcuture belong together (Processes and Objects) | |||
# Do not hardcode flows (fix controllow as late as possible) | |||
# Object Orientation? Object Orientation! | |||
# It can't get any easier | |||
# Look in the crytal ball: UML (but which version?) | |||
The [[Vorträge|speech]] at 8.12.2009 addressed these theses. | |||
}} |
Revision as of 17:31, 14 July 2010
{{{2}}}